[Parabuthus]

Scorpion envenomations are usually treated either by scorpion antivenin or by symptomatic treatment. There have always been a discussion on which methods is best and different studies have been inconclusive.

Fekri Abroug and co-workers have now published a meta-analysis of controlled studies on the use of antivenins in severe scorpion envenomations. Their conclusion is that there is a difference between world regions on how effective antivenins are: The effect in Old World scorpions is not proven and they do not reccoment the use of antivenins until proper RCT studies have proven their efficacy. On the contrary, studies have shown that scorpion antivenin hastens the recovery of patients stung by scorpions in Arizona.

Abstract:
<span style="font-size:85%;">Background Despite conflicting evidence, specific serotherapy is recommended for scorpion envenomation. Methods A meta-analysis of prospective or observational controlled studies, comparing intravenous scorpion antivenin (SAV) with control, was performed. Binary outcomes are reported as risk difference for clinical improvement and mortality rates. Analysis was performed both for the whole number of included studies and for two subgroups (set up according to the geographic origin of scorpions). Results Nine studies (four randomised controlled trials (RCTs), five observational) enrolling 687 patients were identified. Six dealt with Old World scorpions and three originated from Arizona. Overall, the rate of clinical improvement was similar in SAV treated and untreated patients (risk difference¼0.22, 95% CI -0.35 to 0.79;
p¼0.45 for effect). Subgroup analysis showed favourable effects of SAV in the Arizona scorpion
envenomation (risk difference¼0.53; 95% CI 0.16 to 0.91; p